“Forty per cent of audits show major deficiencies. With AI reshaping audit in Australia and APAC, auditors must shift from referee to goalkeeper to protect audit quality.”
Audit quality under pressure
Audit regulators continue to sound the alarm. In 2022, the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board found that 40% of audits it inspected contained one or more significant deficiencies(Tellen.ai). Similar concerns have surfaced across Australia and the wider APAC region, where inspection results point to recurring weaknesses in risk assessment and testing.
For firms already battling compressed timelines, resource shortages and evolving regulations, these findings are a reminder that current approaches are not keeping pace.
The goalkeeper analogy
At the recent Caseware Speaker Series, cybersecurity and risk expert David Gee argued that the profession must rethink its role.
“Referees only call it when they see it,” he said. “Goalkeepers anticipate threats, position themselves ahead of time, and protect the team from loss.”
For auditors, this means shifting from a compliance-first mindset to one that anticipates risk, leverages technology and prevents problems before they surface.
Technology is redefining the play
The tools now exist to make that shift possible. According to KPMG, 76% of Australian companies are already using or piloting AI in financial reporting, and 89% expect full adoption in the near term (The Australian).
For auditors, AI and automation open the door to:
- population-level testing instead of sampling
- continuous transaction monitoring
- more time spent on judgment and assurance rather than routine checks
Yet adoption across firms remains uneven. In the UK, regulators recently noted that even the largest firms do not consistently track how automation is influencing audit quality (Financial Times).
Referees vs goalkeepers
The difference in approach is clear: